Visualizing Decision Trees

A 2016 paper by Wicker and Cooper, describing a molecular descriptor designed to capture molecular flexibility, popped up on Twitter this week.  This paper reminded me of the power of a simple decision tree.  Decision trees can often provide an efficient way of looking at the relationship between molecular descriptors and experimental data.   They can also provide a means of understanding the relationship between sets of experiments, particularly with pharmacokinetic data.

In this spirit, I thought I'd put together a quick post showing how to build and visualize a decision tree.  This post will also show off a couple of useful Python libraries that I've recently integrated into my workflow. 

In their paper, Wicker and Cooper use a set of 40,541 commercially available molecules, from the ZINC database, to establish a relationship between molecular flexibility and the ability of a molecule to crystallize.  The dataset is divided into two subsets.
  • “observed to crystallize” - molecules that occur in both ZINC and the Cambridge Crystallographic Database (CSD).  
  • “not observed to crystallize” - molecules found in ZINC but not in the CSD
The assumption here is that the molecules not found in the CSD were difficult to crystallize.  There could, of course, be a number of other reasons the “not observed to crystallize” set was not in the CSD, but let's just go with it. 

Time to write some code.  Let's start by importing the necessary Python libraries. 
import pandas as pd
import janitor
from sklearn import tree
from dtreeviz.trees import *
from sklearn.metrics import matthews_corrcoef

Here's a quick rundown on the libraries.
  • pandas - the go-to library for anything having to do with tabular data
  • janitor - the amazing PyJanitor library for cleaning data, more on this below
  • sklearn - the scikit-learn library for all things machine learning 
  • dtreeviz - cool visualizations of decision trees, more below
We start by reading the training set. 
train_df = pd.read_csv("train_desc_with_names.csv")
Let's take a look at the names of the columns in the dataframe.
train_df.columns
Index(['Unnamed: 0', 'MolWt', 'HeavyAtomMolWt', 'NumRadicalElectrons',
       'NumValenceElectrons', 'BalabanJ', 'BertzCT', 'Chi0', 'Chi0n', 'Chi0v',
       ...
       'R6', 'R7', 'R8', 'R9', 'RG10', 'AFRC', 'BFRC', 'nConf20', 'Label',
       'Label names'],
      dtype='object', length=223)
Note that some of the column names have spaces, which can be somewhat inconvenient. Fortunately, the PyJanitor library has functions that enable us to do all sorts of data cleaning. We can use the "clean_names" function to remove the spaces from the column names. We are also taking advantage of the very cool method chaining capability provided by PyJanitor. 
train_df = (train_df.clean_names(case_type="preserve")
            .remove_columns(["Unnamed_0","Label_names"]))
Next, we can extract the x variables (descriptors) and the y variables (response) from the dataframe.
train_X = train_df.remove_columns(["Label"])
train_y = train_df.Label
Time to build the model, let's instantiate a DecisionTreeClassifier.
cls = tree.DecisionTreeClassifier(max_depth=2)
Next, we can train the classifier.
cls.fit(train_X,train_y)
DecisionTreeClassifier(ccp_alpha=0.0, class_weight=None, criterion='gini',
                       max_depth=2, max_features=None, max_leaf_nodes=None,
                       min_impurity_decrease=0.0, min_impurity_split=None,
                       min_samples_leaf=1, min_samples_split=2,
                       min_weight_fraction_leaf=0.0, presort='deprecated',
                       random_state=None, splitter='best')

Now that we have the model, we can use the dtreeviz package to create a visualization.  The scikit-learn package has a method for displaying decision trees (see Figure 6 in Wicker and Cooper for an example), but I haven't found it to be particularly useful.  I like the visualization in dtreeviz because it shows the relationships between the distributions and the decision tree.


feature_names = list(train_X.columns)
viz = dtreeviz(cls, train_X, train_y, feature_names = feature_names, 
               target_name = "Crystallize",class_names=["No","Yes"],scale=2)
viz









The plot above shows the decision points on the x-axis of the histogram showing the distribution.  The distributions in the terminal nodes are shown as pie charts.



It looks like the model is performing well, let's take a look at the performance on the test set.  First, we'll read the data and clean it with PyJanitor.


test_df = pd.read_csv("test_desc_with_names.csv")
test_df = (test_df.clean_names(case_type="preserve")
        .remove_columns(["Unnamed_0","Label_names"]))
test_X = test_df.remove_columns(["Label"])
test_y = test_df.Label

Now we can check the Matthews Correlation Coefficient for the test set.


pred = cls.predict(test_X)
matthews_corrcoef(test_y, pred)


0.7781038157491144

Not bad for a very simple model.  While it's true that there are a lot of sophisticated machine learning models out there, the humble decision tree can often provide an easy way of creating interpretable models.   The dtreeviz package is a nice add-on that enables you to quickly see what the decision tree is doing.  Hopefully, you'll find this useful and integrate it into your data analysis workflow.  






As usual, the code for this post is available in a Jupyter notebook on GitHub.  If you want to run the code without installing software, there is a version on Binder.












































Comments











Post a Comment























Popular posts from this blog









Generative Molecular Design Isn't As Easy As People Make It Look




















Image







I was taken aback by a recent CNBC article entitled “ Generative AI will be designing new drugs all on its own in the near future ”.  I should know better than to pay attention to AI articles in the popular press, but I feel that even scientists working in drug discovery may have a skewed perception of what generative AI can and can’t do.  To understand exactly what’s involved, it might be instructive to walk through a typical generative molecular design workflow and point out a few things.  First, these programs are far from autonomous.  Even when presented with a well-defined problem, generative algorithms produce a tremendous amount of nonsense.  Second, domain expertise is essential when sifting through the molecules produced by a generative algorithm.  Without a significant medicinal chemistry background, one can’t make sense of the results.  Third, while a few nuggets exist in the generative modeling output, a lot of work and good old-fashioned c...








Read more










 AI in Drug Discovery 2023 - A Highly Opinionated Literature Review (Part I)




















Image







Here’s the first part of my review of some interesting machine learning (ML) papers I read in 2023.  As with the previous  editions , this shouldn’t be considered a comprehensive review.  The papers covered here reflect my research interests and biases, and I’ve certainly overlooked areas that others consider vital.  This post is pretty long, so I've split it into three parts, with parts II and III to be posted in the next couple of weeks.    I. Docking, protein structure prediction, and benchmarking II. Large Language Models, active learning, federated learning, generative models, and explainable AI III. Review articles 2023 was a bit of a mixed bag for AI in drug discovery.  Several groups reported that the deep learning methods for protein-ligand docking weren’t quite what they were initially cracked up to be.  AlphaFold2 became pervasive, and people started to investigate, with mixed success, the utility of predicted protein structures.  There...








Read more










AI in Drug Discovery - A Highly Opinionated Literature Review (Part II) 




















Image







Picking up where we left off in Part I , this post covers several other ML in drug discovery topics that interested me in 2023.  Some areas, like large language models, are new, and most of the work is at the proof-of-concept stage.  Others, like active learning, are more mature, and several groups are starting to explore nuances of the methods.   Here’s the structure of Part II.  4. Large Language Models 5. Active Learning 6. Federated Learning 7. Generative Models 8. Explainable AI 9. Other Stuff 4. Large Language Models The emergence of GPT-4 and ChatGPT brought considerable attention to large language models (LLMs) in 2023.  In November and December, several large pharmas held “AI Day” presentations featuring LLM applications for clinical trial data analysis. Many of these groups demonstrated the ability of LLMs to ingest large bodies of unstructured clinical data and subsequently generate tables and reports based on natural language queries.  Asid...








Read more